Complaints....shhhhhh! Don't let your astro read this

Post Reply

Topic author
pengyou
I finally get the smurf thing
Posts: 175
Joined: Sun Nov 09, 2008 5:20 pm

Complaints....shhhhhh! Don't let your astro read this

Post by pengyou »

I just had the lower right ball joint replace on my 'stro. I shared my desire to get an AWD with the mechanic, mostly a good and kindly man, and he shared a mouthful with me. According to him, half of the people with AWD 'strs who have come to him with brake or front end work have had the front drive shaft pulled because of various and sundry problems and because they were only getting 13-14 mpg on the highway. Is this most likely because the owners had not maintained the awd vans properly? Please don't pop my bubble..I was expecting to loose 1-2 mph with an awd drive van, but not 8!

Also, what is the difference between AWD and 4 wheel drive? I have seen several posts here about people who have made this conversion.
New owner of a 1996 Astro named "Plain Jane" - stock right now - with 200,000 miles on it and running like a champ
User avatar

mdmead
ASV Supporter
ASV Supporter
Posts: 2153
Joined: Sun Sep 10, 2006 6:45 pm
Location: Selah, WA
Been thanked: 1 time
Contact:

Re: Complaints....shhhhhh! Don't let your astro read this

Post by mdmead »

I can't speak for everyone, but my 96 AWD hi-top conversion delivered 18-20 mpg on the highway ALL the time. Around town it was 15-18 mpg. The only time my mileage disapointed was towing my snowmobile trailer (in 3rd at 65 mph!) where it dropped to 13-14 mpg. It has the 3.42 gears.

I do think the newer vans, maybe 2wd and AWD, don't get as good as mileage as the older ones. Don't really know why.
Matt
Selah, WA
-96 GMC Safari AWD Hi-Top Conversion -->Stalled 5.3L swap & 5" lift
-74 Ford Bronco -->Far from perfect but mine!
-99 V-10 Ford Super Duty Super Cab 4x4 -->Stock with 285 Cooper ATs
-00 Ford Focus Wagon -->The Red Turd
-95 Ford 24' Class C Motorhome -->My big block sleeper
-07 Can-Am Outlander XT -->My yellow 4x4 quad for work & play
-04 Ski Doo REV Summit -->Still several chassis behind!


No new projects until the current ones are done!
User avatar

T.Low
I plan to be buried in my van
Posts: 1768
Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2007 7:11 pm
Location: Bellingham, Wa
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Complaints....shhhhhh! Don't let your astro read this

Post by T.Low »

mechanic speak:

If a mechanic sees something happen more than once, it's automatically termed "half the time".

Not to discount the issue, I'm just saying.
ImageImageImageImage
AstroLander Build Slideshow
Church bells ringing in the middle of a gunfight.

Spike99
I finally get the smurf thing
Posts: 118
Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2007 12:58 pm
Location: North of America

Re: Complaints....shhhhhh! Don't let your astro read this

Post by Spike99 »

.

My previous 2001 AWD Safari van was a "pig on gas" as well. My buddy has a V8 4x4 Pickup and at times, both our AWDs/4x4s got the same MPGs. And, he had much more power under his hood to justify it. At times, my prevous AWD Safari van drank gas faster than the gas tanker truck following it (well - almost). And if wondering, I maintanined that AWD better then many folks treat their own kids. For example, always changed fluids (all its fluids) before it was due, always installed new plugs, plug wires, rotor / cap, etc. And if something was loose or didn't sound right, it go fixed. Especially if it was on its engine, transmission or a safety item. No mater how much TLC I put into it, that AWD sucked down the gas like it was starving. Especially compared to my previous RWD 1995 Safari van - of same gear ratio. High repair costs and terrible MPGs was the main reasons my wife and I "traded in our previous AWD Safari van". Talk about our new technology V6 van. Its got smaller size engine yet almost 40 more HPs, its got faster take off and it gets twice the MPG (especially on the hiways against head winds while going up hills). Just last weekend, our new van `sipped down` 1/4 tank of gas. For the same distance to/from our seasonal camp site, our previous AWD Safari would have "sucked down" almost 3/4 tank of gas. Thus, we are now saving huge amounts of "fuel cost" - with our newer technology van.

I agree. Don't tell some Astro/Safari folks about a "new technology" van being better. Some folks get extremely defensive with their "old technology / gas hog" Astro/Safari vans - as I discovered on a different Astro/Safari forum... LOL!!!!

.

ihatemybike
I plan to be buried in my van
Posts: 2224
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2008 6:57 pm
Location: Elgin, IL

Re: Complaints....shhhhhh! Don't let your astro read this

Post by ihatemybike »

Grumpy is currently getting over 20 mpg driving around the Chicago burbs. Drive them nicely and they'll do good. Drive them like the typical idiot and sure I could see 13-14 mpg.

The only problem I've had with AWD over 2WD is blowing the front diff due to lack of fluid caused by the seals going bad. Both happened during the winter. My 2000 I never noticed the leak, Grumpy I didn't act on the leak fast enough. Grumpy has a replacement diff now and new seals will be put in after we return from vacation in the Jeep. I'd recommend replacing the seals on any AWD van you get.

AWD is active all the time. Front wheels not going the same speed as the rear, front wheels kick in.

4WD is usually driver selectable and usually adds a extra low range which is great for demanding off-road use. Most 4WD systems are not designed to be engaged when driving on hard dry surfaces, like roads. When taking turns on pavement in 4HI we can feel the the drive line bind and tires shift due to it.
Aaron

2005 Astro (Gandalf) - AWD, 4.3L, 3.42, 130k+ miles
1997 Astro (Grumpy - $250 Rally Van) - AWD, 4.3L, 3.42, LSD, 2" lift, 31" tires, 335k+ orig engine, $30 eBay fuel pump
Prev Astros:99,97,00,94,87,86
User avatar

dunedog
ASV Supporter
ASV Supporter
Posts: 686
Joined: Wed Feb 07, 2007 1:22 pm
Location: Pioneer Valley WMass

Re: Complaints....shhhhhh! Don't let your astro read this

Post by dunedog »

I own an Astro for what it can do for me..!! Not for gas mileage...

It hauls 4x8 goods INSIDE ....which at the time I bought the van only a full size van,Toyota Previa,Town and County/Caravan or older Aerostar could do. Only a full size van or Chrysler product will at this time.

The AWD was also something I was interested in. Wouldn't live without it now....period!

The other plus's were the towing capacity as I had a pop-up and the fact I have been able to mount a snowplow on it.Well,.... eat your heart out, to almost all other van type vehicles on the road.Again these vehicles are more truck than soccer mom kid haulers.

As far as gas mileage,there is a trade off. Yes,there is...!

You lose a couple of miles per gallon with an AWD yes . I average around 15 MPG have gotten as much as 18 and as little 12.5 .Six months a year I drive in cold weather.Gas mileage suffers if driving mainly around town.
If you want gas mileage get an older 2wd model . I think they are probably lighter in weight and therefore get you better mileage.
1999 LS AWD 3" Lift,4.10's,Snowplow,9500lb Ramsey winch
User avatar

Smiliesafari
ASV Supporter
ASV Supporter
Posts: 2667
Joined: Sat Dec 02, 2006 12:34 pm
Location: Orlando, FL

Re: Complaints....shhhhhh! Don't let your astro read this

Post by Smiliesafari »

I'd like to get better MPG also. The Smilie van gets 12-13 city and 17-18 highway. I guess that's not too bad considering I carry an extra 800-900 lbs of ballooning equipment. With the new full custom rearend it should do a little better. I changed the gear ratio from 3:42 to 3:08. The real bottom line is there is nothing available that will work as perfectly for what I use the van for. \:D/
1996 Safari SLX Hotair balloon transport vehicle
User avatar

kings-x59
ASV Supporter
ASV Supporter
Posts: 1374
Joined: Thu Sep 21, 2006 7:50 pm
Location: Cypress, Tx

Re: Complaints....shhhhhh! Don't let your astro read this

Post by kings-x59 »

3:08, no kidding? I have 3.23 gears and I hate them in city driving. great on the highway if I don't push it above 60 mph, I can get 20 mpg, but I do more start and stop driving. Yeesh, 3.08 gears on my van, I'd have add bicycle peddles as an auxilary power source to get it moving.
'89 Astro, 4.3L, TBI. Minor intake and exhaust mods. Rebuilt 700R4 trans (by me). Corvette servo, 0.5" boost valve, police grade 1-2 accumulator spring (shifts fast and solid). B&M stacked plate trans cooler. Bilstein shocks. Belltech sway bars front and back. New head unit, speakers and subwoofer. Needs paint and a new headliner.

name's Steve
I can't remember all I've forgotten about that....
User avatar

Smiliesafari
ASV Supporter
ASV Supporter
Posts: 2667
Joined: Sat Dec 02, 2006 12:34 pm
Location: Orlando, FL

Re: Complaints....shhhhhh! Don't let your astro read this

Post by Smiliesafari »

The idea is that when it gets the V8 (the next big project) the 3:08 gears will work fine. The increase in torque will make up the difference. I do use the Safari for travel so getting the best MPG is important. \:D/
1996 Safari SLX Hotair balloon transport vehicle

Topic author
pengyou
I finally get the smurf thing
Posts: 175
Joined: Sun Nov 09, 2008 5:20 pm

Re: Complaints....shhhhhh! Don't let your astro read this

Post by pengyou »

Thanks for the discussion! A couple of you mentioned "new technology" vs "old technology". Which one gets better gas mileage? and how "new" is "new"? Do you mean "new" as '95 and later? or some other breakoff?

Most 4x4's I have had had a 2 speed gear box in addition to the tranny. Is it possible without getting too "radical" to slip a 2 speed into an awd van?
New owner of a 1996 Astro named "Plain Jane" - stock right now - with 200,000 miles on it and running like a champ

ihatemybike
I plan to be buried in my van
Posts: 2224
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2008 6:57 pm
Location: Elgin, IL

Re: Complaints....shhhhhh! Don't let your astro read this

Post by ihatemybike »

There has been several 2-speed transfer case swaps done. Fairly easy to search out.
Aaron

2005 Astro (Gandalf) - AWD, 4.3L, 3.42, 130k+ miles
1997 Astro (Grumpy - $250 Rally Van) - AWD, 4.3L, 3.42, LSD, 2" lift, 31" tires, 335k+ orig engine, $30 eBay fuel pump
Prev Astros:99,97,00,94,87,86
Post Reply