Chevy & GMC Vans

I was just going back to the van, getting off work, and thinking. They really hit the nail on the head when they built these things. I mean GM took the idea of the 1970 something full sized station wagon and made it what what it was meant to be--truthfully, they did miss the mark by 6 inches of length, but only because of the front seat backs.

But they made a vehicle that would tote the family, allow a fellow to bring in things necessary to add on to the home or otherwise improve, help a fellow to make a living if he was a contractor, tote home appliances and furniture as a family grows, and tow a realistic size camper to take them all on vacation camping. Why the hell has noone attempted to clone this vehicle since?

I forgot to mention one of the best parts. They put it all in a package you can parallel park!

I think most of us agree. You need not wonder why the auto industry is broke. It started in the 70's. They quit making vehicles that the American public wanted. For 30 plus years they have made a bunch of generic crap. Even today they still haven't caught up with that tiny nation called Japan. It won't change any time soon. The "Good Old Boy Club" in Detroit needs to go away.

Detroit had more problems than marketable vehicles in the '70's. Quality control was nonexistent. Brand new vehicles were a p.o.s. right off the show room floor. I have to agree about the Astros and Safaris, I was really surprised at how maneuverable my Astro was when I first started driving it.

A V8 would have been a nice option though....

SoCalli V8 wrote:A V8 would have been a nice option though....

A ZR2 Highrider 4x4 with a pop top would have been a nice option, though.


Oh, BTW, I totally agree.

A v8 isnt even necesary.

How bout 2006 models and newer with one of their other newer v6 engones with more power. We just boght an 09 Mazda, 3.7L v6 with 272HP. I mean, I know GM has similar engines. Just a revamped v6 with more power would be cool.

Even a hybrid in 09.

Lots they could have done.

There are no rear wheel drive minivans, you cant get a minivan with more than a 3500# tow capacity anymore.

Look at the newest model caravan, if that body shape isnt looking more like an astro, I dont know what is.

Lets all have a moment of silence for the death of our good friend...the ASTRO/2005. The Uplander is a joke! The U.S does not produce a sport utility van, which surely would have a market.

I have a dream ...that some day...the Astro will be resurrected!!!
The Offroad Package:
-4inch lift: Long travel, HD front suspension with slip yoke axle shafts (1ton), mega travel ball joints, manual hubs
-AWD,4HI,4LO Tcase
-Fancy powerful V6, V8, Diesel...whatever
-Friggen T-Low's pop-top, with camper interior
-Same wheel base length, but 2inches wider (magically adapted sliding door)
-Body is 6inches longer in rear
-Skid plates and rockrails

Why Why WHYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY??????????????????

Its hard to believe that the numbers just were'nt there to justify production. I see the darn things everywhere and they haven't built a new one for almost 5 years now.

You look at all the successful implementation of all the different versions of the Subaru wagon and ask why didn't GM offer some of those versions of the van? A low rider street Syclone/Typhoon version; a High Rider Zr2 version, a Westphalia version.

I really wish that i would have bought the Safari Condo camper version out of Qeubec back in '99 as a business vehicle when I owned my own business instead of my Dodge Dakota but #1; I didn't know about Safari Condo, and #2; I was blind to the attributes of the Astro at that time. Even though I always was interestd in the Vanagon, the Astro drove right by me every day of my life and I never noticed them! (Hangs head in shame )

Your right, I see them all over the damn place, considering they have not been made in almost 5 years, its amazing how many are on the road.

What did Cargo Van users switch to? I mean locksmiths and utility companies etc etc? There is NO Alternative

There is nothing on the market today that compares.

Yesterday I went exploring old forest service roads in the mountains (again). I brought my dual sport on the back of the van to test out a new securement system(besides, it was still on there from the nite before), and my friend rode with me in the van, as his Sportsmobile is in the shop (again, poor guy).

We came to some roads that looked overgrown and that they would probably dead end like the others had already. I decided to take the dual sport and scout it real quick. To my suprise the road cleared a bit and went on for a long ways (housrs actually). I rode back to the van and told my friend to follow in my Astro (way behind as I was going 2.5 times faster on the bike) .

It was his first time driving it. He praised the nimbleness through the tight spots, the ride quality on the old unmaintained forest service roads ("it rides like a Cadilac compared to my Sportsmobile"), and the throttle response. It was really nice to hear the prasies, especially from a Sportsmoblie owner.

On the hour long ride home, we talked at length about the very same topic as this thread's OP. Nobody is making a midsize van, and why not? Europe does have the VW Euro Van Syncro with Portal axles, but its not coming to North America, and its $50k anyway. There is so much more that could have been done with the Astro. Makes ya wonder.




Mt Baker. 10,500' peak.

The Chev Express comes in AWD, but I like the short wheelbase and compact size of the Astro.

I have owned this van now for just about four days.

Every time I jump in I think... "where have you been all my life!"

I have owned about 20 different vehicles and none of them can touch the van.


Now, if the van had a choice of AWD/4wd/2wd...that would be fantastic..much like the newer burbs came with.

And a V8 would be nice.

Amen brutha

After using the snot out of this thing this summer, I agree!
Why did GM ever stop building these things?
A buddy of mine even ditched his VW Westphalia Synchro in favor of a 99 AWD!

john